I don't follow you. Don't most of us have motives for why we support a candidate? He thinks like us? He is likely to do business with us? I don't see how that is bias on the paper's part. If I decide I am going to support Larry Lay for example does that make me bias because I allow someone to post a pro-Larry post? You can't prove that something has not happened. I mean you can't prove that because nobody posts a pro-Chip post my website has to be bias to the anti-Chip faction.
Its kind of like the morons who say we censor posts. Most of them know somebody who had a third cousin who didn't get their post approved. Lets say they are telling the truth. Do you know why they didn't get it approved? Its kind of like the guy earlier today saying he didn't make an accusation he was just repeating what someone had told him.
I'm not disagreeing with you at all I am just saying that editorials are monsters. If you post or publish one the other side will get mad. But they forget to send in their own.
Chip Brown
Owner Maynardville.Com